Position paper for Chile
| Committee: | GA First |
| Topic: | Reducing space threats through norms, rules and principles of responsible behaviours |
| Paper text: | |
| In just six decades, humanity has gone from launching Sputnik to managing over 30,000 trackable objects in orbit, a realm once defined by wonder now shadowed by risk. We see outer space as a shared domain open to all, owned by none. Yet as technological capability spreads and new actors emerge, the potential for miscalculation, debris, and weaponization increases dramatically. We reaffirm its support for the UN Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space (COPUOS) and the Guidelines for the Long-Term Sustainability (LTS) of Outer Space Activities under General Assembly Resolution 74/82, alongside the Open-Ended Working Group on Reducing Space Threats (Resolution 76/231). These mechanisms are indispensable, but voluntary norms alone are no longer enough to guarantee peace above Earth.
Recent years have seen a disturbing escalation in anti-satellite (ASAT) testing, debris generation, and opaque military activity. For developing nations, the consequences are especially severe. Many rely on shared or leased satellite infrastructure for weather forecasting, climate monitoring, and emergency response. A collision in orbit could cripple humanitarian coordination or obstruct critical data flows, undermining global progress toward the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Thus, we call for a Framework Convention on Responsible Space Behavior, a legally binding agreement focused on non-weaponization, transparency, debris mitigation, and responsible data sharing. To reinforce this, we propose a set of confidence-building measures: open data exchanges, independent peer reviews of national space policies, and stronger coordination between COPUOS and the UN First Committee on Disarmament. We also advocate expanding the UN-SPIDER program to directly connect responsible space practices with humanitarian benefits such as disaster risk reduction, early-warning systems, and sustainable resource management. While this Committee has advanced efforts to ensure safety in outer space, we believe that commitment must now lead to action. We call for the drafting of a Framework Convention by 2030 to transform voluntary pledges into binding international law preserving peace, rebuilding trust, and securing outer space as a domain of sustainability and shared progress for all humankind. | |
| Committee: | GA First |
| Topic: | The illicit trade in small arms and light weapons in all its aspects |
| Paper text: | |
| For over two decades, we have stood as a steadfast and constructive presence within the First Committee, actively advancing the global agenda on disarmament and arms control. From its early support for the 2001 Programme of Action and the 2005 International Tracing Instrument to its co-sponsorship of resolutions such as A/RES/60/81 (2005) and A/RES/70/49 (2015) on combating the illicit trade in small arms and light weapons, our record reflects both consistency and conviction. Through regional cooperation with UNODA and initiatives under Security Council Resolution 1540 (2004), we have translated multilateral commitments into national capacity and South–South collaboration, transforming words into sustained action.
Chile envisions a world where every weapon is accounted for, where transparency replaces secrecy, and where no community lives in fear of arms diverted from legality to violence. We urge this Committee to adopt a concrete implementation roadmap by 2026, turning promises into systems that work. Peace demands vigilance. Each weapon traced, each loophole closed, strengthens the wall between order and chaos. Chile stands ready to act to help build a world where disarmament is not an aspiration, but an achievement shared by all humankind. Every illegal weapon traded, every reckless act in orbit, is a strike against global order. We have seen what happens when the rules bend streets flooded with untraceable arms, debris fields threatening satellites, and trust between nations hanging by a thread. We believe peace is not inherited it is built. The First Committee exists to ensure that the tools of progress never become instruments of destruction. We stand ready to defend that purpose with law, cooperation, and conviction. | |
| Committee: | GA Second |
| Topic: | Role of the United Nations in promoting development in the context of globalization and interdependence |
| Paper text: | |
| We believe that globalization can be a tool for development that connects people, economies and ideas across borders. However, not all countries have been able to equally share the benefits. Developing states face obstacles and barriers in accessing global markets, while challenges such as debt, trade inequality, and technology leave them unable to compete. All member states have a responsibility to promote interdependence in a way that is in accordance with our Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) as the guiding framework for these efforts.
We believe globalization is not only about trade, investment, and growth, but also about inclusion and sustainability. As a leading exporter of copper and lithium, we have experienced firsthand both the opportunities and disadvantages of using global markets. The Declaration on the Right to Development (1986) and the Millennium Development Goals (2000) already emphasized that progress must be enjoyed by all. Building on this, the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development reminds us that fairer trade rules, support for debt relief, and technology transfer are important steps to achieve better growth. Chile values its cooperation and promises with the UN, including the 2023–2026 Cooperation Framework, which aligns UN support with national priorities like sustainable growth, social inclusion, and climate resilience. The future of globalization must focus on equity, not just efficiency. By continuing to encourage collaboration between all nations and strengthening methods for fair development, the UN can shift globalization from being a producer of inequality to a tool for global wealth. We are committed to working with fellow Member States to ensure that the SDGs become not only goals on paper, but real progress achieved through collective action. | |
| Committee: | GA Second |
| Topic: | Protection of global climate for present and future generations of humankind |
| Paper text: | |
| Chile sees climate change as a crisis that is not on its way, but already here. It affects millions of people worldwide. Climate change knows no bounds, and because the Earth is an interconnected system, global cooperation is the only solution. Severe droughts, desertification, and water scarcity are all problems that threaten development and human well-being. For this reason, Chile has made climate action a national priority, passing the Climate Change Framework Law (2022) and committing to carbon neutrality by 2050. These initiatives align with the Paris Agreement (2015) and the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (1992), both of which guide global cooperation on reducing emissions and preparing for climate impacts.
However, we recognize that we cannot achieve these goals alone. Developing countries often face difficult choices between economic growth and environmental protection. Wealthier states must do more to support financing, technology, and capacity building, consistent with past agreements under the Kyoto Protocol (1997) and the UNFCCC’s principle of common but differentiated responsibilities. We support the UN’s role in ensuring transparency and accountability in climate commitments. Public trust is essential, and Member States must be willing to share progress openly and accurately. Expanding renewable energy, reducing fossil fuel dependence, and strengthening vulnerable communities are environmental goals that help us in so many other important aspects of the SDG’s. By working together under the guidance of past and future UN resolutions and frameworks, we can ensure that protecting the global climate is a goal that we all help to complete. | |
| Committee: | GA Third |
| Topic: | Universal realization of the right of peoples to self-determination |
| Paper text: | |
| We stand in support of protecting indigenous rights and expanding access to quality education across the world. Indigenous peoples have long faced systemic injustices such as land theft, racism, and exclusion, leading to the loss of cultural heritage and economic opportunity. For example, in South America, groups like the Mapuche, Aymara, and Rapa Nui continue to fight for recognition and equality despite progress made through the Indigenous Law of 1993 and the establishment of the National Corporation for Indigenous Development (CONADI). We believe that education plays a key role in ending these inequalities. However, many citizens across the region only reach a secondary level of education, which perpetuates poverty and limits social mobility. To truly empower indigenous communities, we heavily support initiatives aligned with the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP) and Sustainable Development Goals 4 and 10, which emphasize inclusive education and the reduction of inequalities. | |
| Committee: | GA Third |
| Topic: | Improvement of the situation of women and girls in rural areas |
| Paper text: | |
| We support collaborative regional action to ensure that education systems promote cultural inclusion and respect for indigenous identity. This includes implementing bilingual and intercultural education programs that integrate indigenous languages and traditions, as well as expanding scholarship and teacher training opportunities in rural and under-served communities. Recalling Resolution 74/135 adopted by the General Assembly known as the Rights of Indigenous Peoples on 18 December 2018, we invite other member states to aid in stressing the importance of no one being left behind. The delegation also calls for the creation of a South American Indigenous Education Network (SAIEN) under UN guidance to share best practices and strengthen cooperation between member states. Additionally, we encourage the promotion of anti-discrimination policies and public awareness campaigns to address prejudice against indigenous peoples. By investing in education, cultural understanding, and equality, we believe that all of us can move toward a more just and united future—one where every individual, regardless of origin, can contribute freely and fully to society. We reaffirm the rights that remain a priority in the United Nations 2030 agenda that combats hunger, removes barriers to educational access, and meets complex humanitarian needs. | |
| Committee: | GA Plenary |
| Topic: | Our ocean, our future, our responsibility |
| Paper text: | |
| We recognize that the protection and sustainable use of the ocean are essential to global stability, economic growth, and environmental security. Our 4,000-kilometer Pacific coastline supports important industries such as fishing, aquaculture, and maritime trade. However, these sectors are increasingly threatened by over-fishing, pollution, and the effects of climate change. We believe that ocean protection requires strong, enforceable international cooperation and that every State, whether coastal or landlocked, must contribute to this effort.
Our plan is informed by two key United Nations documents. The first is the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (1982), which established the concept of Exclusive Economic Zones (EEZs) and assigned States responsibility for conserving and managing marine resources in those zones. Building on this foundation, we urge the creation of a UN Maritime Accountability and Data Initiative, an international platform that will collect, publish, and verify data on ocean pollution, fishing activities, and marine biodiversity. This system would increase transparency by allowing all Member States to monitor progress toward global conservation goals and to identify violations of sustainable resource use. We are prepared to contribute scientific expertise and satellite monitoring capacity to help launch this initiative under the United Nations Environment Program (UNEP). The second guiding document is General Assembly Resolution 72/73 (2017), “Our Ocean, Our Future: Call for Action.” This resolution called on Member States to strengthen ocean science, reduce marine pollution, and promote sustainable fisheries. We intend to implement these goals through a Global Marine Science Exchange Program, developed in partnership with UNEP and UNESCO’s Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission. This program would facilitate the transfer of marine research technology and training between developed and developing countries, ensuring that all nations can effectively monitor their waters and protect marine ecosystems. We view these future actions as direct continuations of existing United Nations commitments, not replacements for them. We invite all Member States to collaborate in advancing data transparency, supporting equitable scientific development, and ensuring that the protection of the ocean remains a shared international responsibility. | |
| Committee: | GA Plenary |
| Topic: | Strengthening of the coordination of emergency humanitarian assistance of the United Nations |
| Paper text: | |
| We are committed to strengthening the coordination and efficiency of humanitarian assistance within the United Nations system. As a country that has endured some of the most severe natural disasters in modern history, including the 2010 earthquake and tsunami, we understand the importance of well-organized and rapid aid delivery. Coordination failures cost lives, and limited funding continues to slow response efforts. We believe that humanitarian aid must be predictable, collaborative, and guided by data-driven planning.
Our position is shaped by two important United Nations documents. The first is General Assembly Resolution 46/182 (1991), “Strengthening of the Coordination of Emergency Humanitarian Assistance of the United Nations.” This resolution created the Emergency Relief Coordinator and emphasized the principles of humanity, neutrality, and impartiality. Building upon this, we urge the creation of a Global Humanitarian Response Coordination Platform, a centralized digital system where United Nations agencies, governments, and humanitarian organizations can share information on available resources, personnel, and logistics in real time. This platform would reduce duplication, prevent supply gaps, and allow faster mobilization of aid across borders. We support developing this mechanism under the supervision of the Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) and stand ready to contribute technical expertise in emergency communications. The second document is the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction (2015–2030), adopted through General Assembly Resolution 69/283 (2015). The framework prioritizes understanding risk, improving disaster governance, and investing in resilience. To advance these goals, we urge a United Nations Disaster Preparedness Evaluation Mechanism, which would assess Member States’ readiness and capacity for emergency response based on standardized international benchmarks. The results would be used to target financial and technical assistance to nations most in need, ensuring that global resources are distributed more effectively. We believe these steps will strengthen coordination and accountability in humanitarian aid while maintaining respect for national sovereignty. We invite all Member States to cooperate in enhancing information sharing, improving preparedness, and ensuring that humanitarian assistance reaches affected populations swiftly and fairly. | |
| Committee: | IAEA |
| Topic: | Nuclear security |
| Paper text: | |
| We believe that nuclear security is one of the greatest shared responsibilities of our time. Around the world, the growing use of nuclear and radioactive materials has brought both opportunity and risk. Global challenges such as nuclear terrorism, illicit trafficking, cyberattacks on nuclear facilities, and weak physical protection measures continue to threaten our collective safety.
We recognize the important work that has already been done through the International Convention for the Suppression of Acts of Nuclear Terrorism (2005), the Convention on the Physical Protection of Nuclear Material (CPPNM, 1980) and its 2005 Amendment, as well as IAEA General Conference Resolutions GC(66)/RES/11 (2022) and GC(67)/RES/9 (2023) on “Nuclear Security.” We also support the ongoing implementation of the IAEA Nuclear Security Plan 2022–2025, which helps Member States improve detection, prevention, and response capacities. Regionally, we continue to uphold the Treaty of Tlatelolco (1967) and work with OPANAL to maintain Latin America as a nuclear weapons-free and secure zone. We want to strengthen regional cooperation through more joint training exercises, peer assessments, and information exchange, especially within Latin America and the Caribbean. At home, we maintain strong national standards through the Comisión Chilena de Energía Nuclear (CCHEN), ensuring that all nuclear and radiological materials are used safely and under strict regulatory control. However, we know that not every country has the same technical or financial resources to build similar systems. That is why we want to see the IAEA expand its technical cooperation programs, especially those focused on training, peer review, and assistance to developing states, so that no country becomes a weak link in the global security chain. We also believe that information sharing and transparency between Member States must be strengthened to prevent illicit trafficking networks from exploiting gaps in enforcement. At the same time, we firmly believe that security should not block peaceful use. Under Article IV of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), every state has the right to access nuclear energy for development. Our goal is to achieve a balanced approach—one that protects people while enabling innovation. | |
| Committee: | IAEA |
| Topic: | Strengthening the Agency's activities related to nuclear science, technology and applications |
| Paper text: | |
| We see nuclear science not as a threat, but as a tool for hope and development. Around the world, many countries still struggle with major global challenges—cancer, food insecurity, water scarcity, energy inequality, and the accelerating impacts of climate change. We believe that strengthening the IAEA’s activities in nuclear science and technology can help address these problems in meaningful ways.
The UN and IAEA have already made great progress through programs such as the IAEA Technical Cooperation Programme (TCP), the Atoms4Food and Atoms4Climate initiatives, and General Conference Resolutions GC(66)/RES/12 (2022) and GC(67)/RES/11 (2023), which encourage Member States to integrate nuclear applications into sustainable development efforts. We are also encouraged by the IAEA’s Rays of Hope campaign, which expands access to cancer diagnosis and radiotherapy, especially in developing regions. We have seen firsthand how nuclear techniques help our people. They allow us to improve agricultural productivity, monitor our water resources, and enhance public health through advanced diagnostic methods. But we also face challenges like prolonged drought, rising temperatures, and limited access to advanced radiotherapy equipment. These are not problems any one nation can solve alone. That is why we want to see the IAEA expand programs that promote capacity-building, research cooperation, and technology transfer, especially for developing and middle-income countries. We support greater funding for regional training centers, the expansion of fellowships for young scientists, and new initiatives that connect nuclear innovation directly to the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). We also believe that as we expand peaceful uses, we must not lose sight of safety, security, and non-proliferation. We support continued strengthening of the IAEA safeguards system, the Additional Protocol, and the Agency’s verification missions to build global trust and ensure that nuclear technology is used only for peaceful purposes. | |
| Committee: | CND |
| Topic: | Promoting alternative development as a development-oriented drug control strategy that is sustainable and inclusive |
| Paper text: | |
| Since the late 20th century, the international community has come to understand that addressing the world drug problem requires more than eradication or enforcement measures alone. We recognize the importance of alternative development as a long-term and sustainable strategy to prevent and eliminate the illicit cultivation of drug crops. As affirmed by the United Nations General Assembly Special Session on the World Drug Problem (A/RES/S-20/4, 1998), alternative development is a process that integrates rural development efforts with national growth and poverty reduction, considering the unique socioeconomic conditions of affected communities.
We reaffirm our commitment to the United Nations Convention against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (1988) and the Political Declaration and Plan of Action on International Cooperation to Counter the World Drug Problem (A/RES/64/182, 2009). These international agreements emphasize the need to address the underlying economic and social causes of illicit drug cultivation. We support the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, particularly Goal 1 on ending poverty and Goal 8 on promoting sustained, inclusive economic growth, as essential frameworks for ensuring that alternative development contributes to both social wellbeing and stability. International cooperation remains one of our top diplomatic priorities. The challenges related to illicit cultivation transcend borders, which require a coordinated global approach. Through participation and engagement with the Commission on Narcotic Drugs (CND) and the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC), we advocate for stronger collaboration in research, information exchange, and technical assistance to promote sustainable agricultural practices and economic diversification. The effectiveness of alternative development initiatives is enhanced due to collective action among member states worldwide. This ensures that such programs are adaptable to diverse social, economic, and environmental contexts. We acknowledge the success of UNODC pilot initiatives, such as the Alternative Development projects in Southeast Asia, which showed that combining rural infrastructure, education, and market access can help communities transition from illicit to legal livelihoods. Building on this example, we support the expansion of funding for small scale agricultural cooperatives, and entrepreneurship training to empower local populations. We also encourage linking alternative development with environmental sustainability, ensuring that rural communities can adapt to climate challenges while maintaining stable incomes. We remain committed to advancing a balanced and community centered approach to the World Drug Problem. By emphasizing cooperation, sustainable development, and social inclusion, we believe that alternative development offers a viable path toward reducing illicit cultivation and promoting lasting peace and prosperity globally. | |
| Committee: | CND |
| Topic: | Promoting comprehensive and scientific evidence-based early prevention |
| Paper text: | |
| Tackling the issue of drug cultivation and abuse has been an issue for generations around the globe, with conventions being held in 1909 in Shanghai, 1912 in Hague and even by the League of Nations in 1925. But for the United Nations, a pivotal 1961 Single Convection on Narcotic Drugs would cement this issue, as one that member states must tackle together in international cooperation. In the 64 years since that convection, there have been various programs, resolutions, reports, and efforts made to combat this issue with varying success and failures, particularly in the realm of early prevention.
Early prevention was noted as an important piece of truly dismantling narcotic drug development and trafficking. Education and awareness limit the exploitation of vulnerable communities as well as the reach of narcotic drugs to other populations. This is valuable at this time as drug use abuse has continued to rise globally, particularly in youth, as noted by the UNODC. With this rise as also been the issue of data on NPS, or New Psychoactive Substances or “Designer Drugs”, which have the issue of being new substances not controlled by the 1961 or 1971 drug conventions. To strengthen early prevention, there is a need for more comprehensive and scientific evidence-based data. To not only rely on common knowledge, but to have intel that can truly benefit our efforts. We have worked internationally in cooperation with various states and countries to tackle this issue. We have our National Board of New Psychoactive Substances, or MNNSP system, that works under the framework of both CHAMPS and RePS, and has potential to work with the UNODC EWA system to gather information on NPS. The ability of other countries to implement a similar system would strengthen the United Nations' ability to tackle NPS and better protect all countries and states. We have also worked with other states on education for youth through the Unplugged Program, which provides education through school curriculum with data-backed evidence and implementation. By focusing on the youth through an integrated school program, we’re able to provide education and awareness at an early age with collaboration and feedback from educators, which over time strengthens the program. In collaboration with other countries and states, we would support the creation and application of similar programs backed by the UN to support countries in the effort to lower drug use and strengthen early prevention systems and programs. It is through this that we can see a healthy future that benefits communities and people around the world. | |
Back to the list of countries