Return To: 2025 Handbook
2025 Handbook The AMUN Approach to Model United Nations
AMUN Philosophy and Realism AMUN Philosophy and Realism
One of the core principles of AMUN is to mirror the practice and dynamics of the United Nations as much as possible. To that end, AMUN strives to create and conduct simulations that are a realistic representation of diplomacy at the United Nations and within the broader international system. We believe this commitment furthers AMUN’s aims to create a fair and engaging experience for all representatives and to enhance the educational mission of the organization.
For any issue before the United Nations, each Member or Observer State has a range of possible responses; however, a realistic simulation should include only those options that would have reasonably been considered by a State at that specific moment in time. In other words, certain options may be off the table due to historical, cultural or political constraints that limit what a State could or would do. Options that fall outside these constraints should not be included to best maintain the realism of the simulation.
In conjunction with our policy on delegations that are “Out of Character” (OOC), members of the AMUN Secretariat will work with representatives to ensure the highest-quality and most realistic simulation of the United Nations possible, while still allowing innovative and creative thinking to open up new possibilities for the United Nations and the international community.
The Purview of Each Simulation The Purview of Each Simulation
Each background guide contains a brief overview of that simulation’s purview, which provides a general outline of the types of discussions each simulation might have on the topics in question. Purview is an extremely important, though often unspoken, concept in the United Nations system, where a variety of different committees, councils and commissions may discuss different aspects of an international problem. Not stepping on another body’s toes or into its territory is a matter of diplomatic courtesy, respect and an acknowledgement of specific expertise. Representatives should research their topics carefully, so their deliberations can focus on the piece of the problem considered within their simulation’s purview.
For example, consider the topic of development. A wide variety of committees, councils and commissions at the United Nations address this topic, but will do so in different ways. The General Assembly First Committee might discuss the relationship between disarmament and development. At the same time, the General Assembly Second Committee may discuss a variety of financing initiatives to assist developing countries. Similarly, the General Assembly Third Committee might discuss the social and humanitarian considerations that stem from a lack of development, including gender issues, economic concerns or the impact on underrepresented populations, such as the elderly or disabled. The General Assembly Fourth Committee may discuss the development issues of Non-Self-Governing Territories. The General Assembly Plenary might discuss the problem in its entirety or address issues that cut across the mandates of the committees. By contrast, the Economic and Social Council would focus on how the United Nations specialized and technical agencies work with Member States to support economic and social development. The Security Council would address the interlinkages between peace, security and development.
Different aspects of a single problem are regularly discussed in different bodies. More importantly, at the United Nations, delegations are typically careful to only discuss those aspects relevant to their own committees, councils and commissions, leaving other aspects to others in their delegation to address in the appropriate forum.
AMUN Philosophy and Realism AMUN Philosophy and Realism
One of the core principles of AMUN is to mirror the practice and dynamics of the United Nations as much as possible. To that end, AMUN strives to create and conduct simulations that are a realistic representation of diplomacy at the United Nations and within the broader international system. We believe this commitment furthers AMUN’s aims to create a fair and engaging experience for all representatives and to enhance the educational mission of the organization.
For any issue before the United Nations, each Member or Observer State has a range of possible responses; however, a realistic simulation should include only those options that would have reasonably been considered by a State at that specific moment in time. In other words, certain options may be off the table due to historical, cultural or political constraints that limit what a State could or would do. Options that fall outside these constraints should not be included to best maintain the realism of the simulation.
In conjunction with our policy on delegations that are “Out of Character” (OOC), members of the AMUN Secretariat will work with representatives to ensure the highest-quality and most realistic simulation of the United Nations possible, while still allowing innovative and creative thinking to open up new possibilities for the United Nations and the international community.
The Purview of Each Simulation The Purview of Each Simulation
Each background guide contains a brief overview of that simulation’s purview, which provides a general outline of the types of discussions each simulation might have on the topics in question. Purview is an extremely important, though often unspoken, concept in the United Nations system, where a variety of different committees, councils and commissions may discuss different aspects of an international problem. Not stepping on another body’s toes or into its territory is a matter of diplomatic courtesy, respect and an acknowledgement of specific expertise. Representatives should research their topics carefully, so their deliberations can focus on the piece of the problem considered within their simulation’s purview.
For example, consider the topic of development. A wide variety of committees, councils and commissions at the United Nations address this topic, but will do so in different ways. The General Assembly First Committee might discuss the relationship between disarmament and development. At the same time, the General Assembly Second Committee may discuss a variety of financing initiatives to assist developing countries. Similarly, the General Assembly Third Committee might discuss the social and humanitarian considerations that stem from a lack of development, including gender issues, economic concerns or the impact on underrepresented populations, such as the elderly or disabled. The General Assembly Fourth Committee may discuss the development issues of Non-Self-Governing Territories. The General Assembly Plenary might discuss the problem in its entirety or address issues that cut across the mandates of the committees. By contrast, the Economic and Social Council would focus on how the United Nations specialized and technical agencies work with Member States to support economic and social development. The Security Council would address the interlinkages between peace, security and development.
Different aspects of a single problem are regularly discussed in different bodies. More importantly, at the United Nations, delegations are typically careful to only discuss those aspects relevant to their own committees, councils and commissions, leaving other aspects to others in their delegation to address in the appropriate forum.